Connect with us

News

Synagogue Church Rejects Coroner’s Ruling Over Collapsed Building | Calls it “Unreasonable, One-sided & Biased”

Published

 on

TB Joshua

Earlier this week, it was requested that a coroner inquest, instituted by the Lagos State government to investigate the collapse of a guest house owned by Synagogue Church of All Nations (SCOAN), indicted the church for negligence.

And now, the church has released an official statement via its Facebook page, condemning the ruling:

OFFICIAL STATEMENT FROM THE SYNAGOGUE, CHURCH OF ALL NATIONS IN RESPECT OF THE VERDICT GIVEN BY THE LAGOS CORONER’S COURT RELATING TO THE INCIDENT THAT HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER 12TH 2014

The Synagogue, Church Of All Nations (SCOAN) rejects the verdict of the coroner on the grounds that it is unreasonable, one-sided and biased. The church maintains its stand that the incident was as a result of sabotage.

From the verdict given today, we would like the public to take note of the following:

There was no finding that the church engaged the services of unqualified or incompetent professionals for the construction of the building.

There was no finding that the church procured substandard materials for the construction of the building, as confirmed by officials of the Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON) who gave evidence at the coroner and certified the materials used were all approved and of good quality.

There was evidence that the church had started processing the relevant building approval before the incident, which had been approved and assessed for payment by the appropriate government bodies.

There was no finding that connected the incident with the lack of a building permit.

There was no finding that church members prevented the statutory responders from carrying out their rescue duties.

The church disagrees most vehemently with the finding that the incident was due to structural failure.

The church considers it strange that the coroner did not refer in its verdict to the evidence of the COREN-registered structural engineer and contractor used by the church nor did it evaluate the conflicting evidence given by civil and structural engineers as to whether or not the incident was as a result of structural failure.

It was a one-sided verdict which left many issues unaddressed and questions unanswered.

The church disagrees with the findings concerning the aircraft that hovered over the six-storey building because there was evidence before the court that the incident could have been brought about by external forces such as controlled demolition or an explosion.

The verdict did not even refer to the CCTV footage which showed the 6-storey building falling in less than 4 seconds – a manner consistent with controlled or externally induced demolition – nor did it refer to the interim report and investigation by the Nigerian police force which pointed to sabotage by external forces.

The church also disagrees with the finding that foundation failure was a remote cause because that is contrary to the overwhelming expert evidence of the structural engineers invited to the coroner who eliminated foundation failure as a possible cause.

The recommendation for the investigation and prosecution of the contractors and structural engineers used by the church for criminal negligence is premature because it gives the impression the coroner has found them guilty when a coroner is not allowed in law to make any finding of civil or criminal liability against anybody.

The recommendation for the investigation of The SCOAN for not possessing the relevant building permits is unwarranted because it did not take into account the evidence that the church had started processing the relevant building approval before the incident. As a matter of fact, the amount payable for the processing had already been assessed by the appropriate government agencies.

The recommendation that statutory responders should be adequately equipped was informed by the fact that the statutory responders who carried out rescue operations in this case were ill-equipped and ill-trained, and that it was the church that mobilised human and material resources to ensure a successful rescue operation.

Finally, the coroner recognised that the conduct of the investigation of the incident was compromised by the failure of the appropriate government agencies to take necessary steps to secure and preserve the scene of the incident, which calls into question the integrity and reliability of the entire investigation.

This is a statement from Barr. Olalekan Ojo, legal counsel to The SCOAN.

We repeat: No matter how long a lie is sustained, the truth will someday prevail!

6 Comments

  1. Drknite

    July 9, 2015 at 7:34 pm

    I will cross Synagogue Church of All Nations of my list of places to visit in Nigeria

  2. Kokie

    July 9, 2015 at 9:50 pm

    You still have to be accountable. Happened on your watch

  3. Kay

    July 9, 2015 at 10:13 pm

    Thief B Joshua has come again. Abeg do sharply and investigate all his churches for structural issues. God knows how many churches he has put up without taking the proper steps

  4. Bimbo

    July 9, 2015 at 10:30 pm

    Pls do you build a structure first before you apply for the relevant building approval? This man must think people are fools.

  5. Adufe kunle

    July 10, 2015 at 12:25 am

    Synagogue shld know that they are not above d law.d church shld comply wt verdict and to know that era of impunity have passed.God knows his truth disciples.

  6. Fleur

    July 10, 2015 at 12:36 pm

    Been wondering about this story. why would anyone want to destroy the building? Is he sitting on choice land?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Star Features

Advertisement
css.php