Connect with us

News

Grand Jury Decision to Not Charge Darren Wilson in Michael Brown Death Causes Violence on Ferguson Streets|Celebs React

Published

 on

Mike BrownA lot of people have expressed disappointment and cried out injustice as the news on the Ferguson grand jury’s decision spreads.

In case you missed it, police officer Darren Wilson will not be charged for the death of Michael Brown, the unarmed African-American boy who was killed back in August(click here if you missed it). This decision has sparked much controversy from the country and shocked the entertainment industry – while also causing a violent reaction on the streets of Ferguson.

A lot of people have used social media to pour out their thoughts over the decision of the grand jury, especially celebrities.

Capture Capture1 Capture2 Capture3

A photo posted by kellyrowland (@kellyrowland) on

A photo posted by Alicia Keys (@aliciakeys) on

A video posted by karrueche (@karrueche) on

A photo posted by @memkoh on

A video posted by Sean Diddy Combs (@iamdiddy) on

A photo posted by LaLa (@lala) on

A photo posted by angelasimmons (@angelasimmons) on

A photo posted by badgalriri (@badgalriri) on

13 Comments

  1. bruno

    November 25, 2014 at 6:21 am

    white privilege wins again.

    • Tee

      November 25, 2014 at 8:14 am

      for now…

  2. ATL's finest

    November 25, 2014 at 7:29 am

    Well oh well! I was definitely not surprised how it ended.. I didn’t watch it so that lessened my panic attack!!! “History proves that the white man is a Devil”~~~ Malcolm X ( God bless him)

  3. Uju Lilian Ikegbune

    November 25, 2014 at 8:47 am

    What a sad, cold n cruel world. He who kills by d gun dies by it. Justice must be served. Only God is d supreme judge. This white peeps are evil n crazy

  4. nonye

    November 25, 2014 at 9:44 am

    I would like to understand what the grand jury’s line of reasoning was… so sad… I really thought this would end differently….

  5. jhennique

    November 25, 2014 at 9:45 am

    you will never know how much the whites still hate blacks. But in times like this, it cannot hide

  6. Mike Doe

    November 25, 2014 at 12:51 pm

    igbo man wants justice and fairness in hausa land….wishful thinking…rip to mike brown sha

    • jay

      November 25, 2014 at 2:34 pm

      please tell them oooh…… We need to rise up and be a powerful economic force to reckon with… That’s the solution .. check.. Israel, Singapore..

  7. wow

    November 25, 2014 at 1:13 pm

    I knew he wasn’t going to be indicted when they took almost 8hrs to tell us an answer they already had. Ferguson looks like a war zone. Racism is alive and well. White supremacy is alive. Pls if you have brothers in America or siblings pls pray for them everyday.

  8. @edDREAMZ

    November 25, 2014 at 2:57 pm

    a.k.a EDWIN CHINEDU AZUBUKO said…
    .
    White…..
    .
    .
    ***CURRENTLY IN JUPITER***

  9. NagosBigBoi

    November 25, 2014 at 3:19 pm

    I listened to the reasons the prosecutor gave for the decisions and it make sense not to indict. For a criminal case, proof is needed “beyond reasonable doubt”….. not “inspite of some doubt”.
    I would have ruled the same way if I was on the jury. I am not saying that this guy may not have been killed unjustly.
    Police know the law and use it to their advantage……we need to begin to understand this. They kill without reason knowing that without a video to prove otherwise, the law is on their side.
    Too many people claimed to be eyewitnesses only to be proved to be lying when challenged with the facts. Some confessed that they were only repeating what they had heard in order to “help”.

    • kay

      November 25, 2014 at 8:59 pm

      You indict on “PROBABLE CAUSE”, not “beyond reasonable doubt”. Please get it right

    • NagosBigBoi

      November 26, 2014 at 1:57 pm

      You are right. A NORMAL grand jury indicts on probable cause. That is why the saying goes that a grand jury will indict a ham sandwich. However, it has been clear that the prosecutor did not want this to be a normal grand jury. He wanted it to be a mini-trial because he did not believe that the cop did anything wrong. Several distinguished college law professors (not the talking heads on TV) have pointed this out for weeks but people did not get this nuance. A prosecutor is legally empowered to present a case to a grand jury in a way that supports his view of the case. He had an option to go through a probable cause hearing with a judge – but he knew it would be more difficult to get a judge to rule the way he wanted.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tangerine Africa

Star Features

css.php