Connect with us


ASUU Says Bill that Proposes 5-year Jail Term for Randy Lecturer Undermines University Autonomy




Senate Floor

Senate Floor

The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) on Monday in Abuja said the Sexual Harassment Bill, 2016 before the Senate undermined university autonomy.

President of the union, Professor Biodun Ogunyemi, stated this at a Public Hearing on the bill, organised by the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Sexual Harassment Bill was sponsored by Senator Ovie Omo-Agege (LP- Delta Central) and co-sponsored by 57 other senators.

The bill seeks to criminalise sexual harassment in tertiary institutions and it, among other things, proposes a five-year jail term for lecturers found guilty of sexual harassment of students.

Ogunyemi said that universities were established by law as autonomous bodies, adding that there were laws that clearly articulated redress procedures.

“As a global norm, universities and other tertiary institutions are established by law as autonomous bodies and have their own laws regulating their affairs.

This includes misconduct generally among both staff and students, with clearly articulated appropriate redress mechanism.

Any law or bill which seeks to supplant these laws violates the university autonomy.

In this particular instance, the bill violates the Federal Government of Nigeria and ASUU agreement of 2009 and as such should be rejected,” he said.

He said that the bill was discriminatory because it was targeted at educators.

According to Ogunyemi, “it is unfair to come up with such a bill; sexual harassment is a societal problem and not peculiar to tertiary institutions”.

He also said that the bill was a violation of Section 42 (1) of the 1999 Constitution, adding that it was embarrassing that the legislative arm could seek to make such law that would violate the Constitution.

Ogunyemi also pointed out that besides violating the Constitution, the bill failed to take cognizance of various extant legislation that adequately dealt with sexual offences.

Faulting the bill further, he said that it failed to provide convincing evidence to show that sexual harassment in tertiary institutions had attained a higher magnitude than other spheres of the society.

“The bill is discriminatory, selective, spiteful, and impulsive and lacks logic and any intellectual base by attacking the character and persons of those in tertiary institutions rather than addressing the issue holistically.

Furthermore, the bill is dangerous and inimical to the institutions as it contains several loose and ambiguous words and terms which could also be used to harass, intimidate, victimize and persecute, especially lecturers, through false accusation,” he said.

However, the National Universities Commission (NUC) supported the introduction of the bill “in view of its relevance” and called for its passage.

The Executive Secretary of the commission, Professor Julius Okojie, said that while federal and state universities had administrative structures for handling grievances, there was nothing wrong in having a legislation to help with that.

“University Miscellaneous Provision Act gives them power to formulate policies and by-laws to guide them and most institutions have structures to handle these incidences. However, there is nothing wrong if there is a legislation to add to what is on ground. We are only saying that universities are doing something about sexual harassment, which may not be enough,” he said.

Okojie therefore called on the senate to extend the scope of the bill to cover primary and secondary schools.

“The bill appears to have duplication of offences already created in our extant laws. There should be holistic approach to accommodate existing regulations in schools,” he said.

He advised that beyond enactment of laws, Code of Conduct should be given to workers in schools, reiterating the need to be morally sound.

He called for more awareness on the matter as well as the need to have dress codes in schools to prevent any form of harassment.

“Senate is empowered to determine what a dress code should be. During a research, we noticed that the issue of harassment is linked to suggestive dressing,” Okojie disclosed.

On its part, Legal Aid Council drew the attention of the senate to some provisions of the bill that required re-examination.

According to Director-General of the council, Joy Bob-Manuel, the mandate of the council is to defend, and unless laws are made in clear terms, lawyers can take advantage of loopholes to make their case.

“We are aware that when a case goes to court technicalities rubbish it. So, there are provisions in the bill that should be looked at a second time.

For instance, 18-year bracket contained in the bill can form technical defeat.

We also suggest that a lawyer in the faculty of law should be made a member of the prohibition committee,” she said.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) was established by the Federal Government of Nigeria in May 1976 to gather and distribute news on Nigeria and cover events of interest to Nigeria at the international level for the benefit of the Nigerian Media and the Public.


  1. Amaa

    June 20, 2016 at 8:29 pm

    It is obvious that your internal laws and regulations have not dealt with the problem . Please allow the legislature to do the work we elected them to do. I went to a Nigerian university for and I know how many times I had to fight off sexual harassment from lecturers and my story isn’t rare almost every female and sometimes male have one horrid story to tell.

  2. CovertNigerian

    June 20, 2016 at 9:02 pm

    I agree with the ASUU official that the law should not target tertiary institutions only. We need a law that is broad enough to address harassment wherever it may occur. Women are sexually harassed in all sorts of places, possibly including right there in the National Assembly Complex, so why have such a narrow law? By the way, how about secondary school students?

    Women and to a far lesser degree men need to be protected everywhere. So beyond broadening the scope beyond tertiary institutions, any law should be gender neutral to cover those rare cases where men are victims.

  3. Busola I

    June 20, 2016 at 10:09 pm

    Thanks for the comments. This is what makes law-making rich and encompassing. At the law reform commission, we recommended that the law should be expanded to include work place harassment and we were generally in support of the Bill though with some modification.

    To answer ASUU, the Bill also takes cognisance of internal mechanisms of universities but realises that the criminal nature of sexual harassment makes it necessary to move out of the realm of internal discipline to police investigation and institution of proceedings at the court of law.

    A careful consideration of the views aforementioned would help in fortifying the Bill and coming up with a complete, working document.

  4. Jalord

    June 20, 2016 at 10:10 pm

    Asuu keep quiet! You are failing the Students.

  5. Expert

    June 21, 2016 at 10:41 am

    I strongly suggest stiff penalties for all manner of sexual misconduct in the Nigerian constitution in addition to the punishment prescribed by the Organization in which the Culprit belongs to. Additionally, there should be regulation of dress code (this applies to both male and female). See through dresses and any dress that reveals/shows the underwear (panties/tights or boxers) or some certain body parts (butt cheeks, excessive cleavage, side boobs )should not be worn in public, There should be some decency in our dressing. These are my thoughts and feel free to share yours. Remember that hardwork pays while destruction comes from a convoluted/demented mind

  6. larz

    June 21, 2016 at 11:39 am

    There should be law on sexual harassment with stiffer punishment for people in positions of power (such as teachers, lecturers, employers, selection team/ committee for awarding contracts etc).

    Having said that, this guy is a joke. His assertion that there are internal mechanism to deal with sexual harassment and that this law appears to undermine university autonomy is just ridiculous. News flash, universities operates under the law of the sovereign state it lies under; there is no such thing as the law undermining universities’ authority. The law is the law and crimes are punishable by the law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Join our ONLINE CAIE Refresher course NOW. From August until October

Star Features